Property limits

So there’s been noise in the market over the past few months with the BOT first coming out saying that they want to stop the search for yield characteristics in the property market. And on Friday it was announced that the below regulations will come into effect by 1 April 2019. 

Property price
Mortgage Contract
Product
LTV threshold
< Bt10m
All contracts
Low-rise houses
95%
< Bt10m
All contracts
Condominium
90%
Bt10m and above
All contracts
All products
80%
Note:
Banks may extend mortgage loans above BOT’s limit but
such loans will carry more risk weighting and thus banks
need to have more capital.  Details are:
– Mortgage loans within BOT’s LTV limit will have RW of 35%
– Mortgage loans above BOT’s LTV limit will have RW of 75% for
  retail borrowers and 100% for non-retail borrowers
New mortgage regulation: LTV Limit – Hard limit
Property price
Mortgage Contract
Product
LTV Limit
< Bt10m
1st contract
Low-rise houses
95%
1st contract
Condominium
90%
< Bt10m
2nd contract, but 1st mortgage contract signed 3 years
All products
90%
2nd contract, but 1st mortgage contract signed less than 3 years
All products
80%
3rd contract
All products
70%
Bt10m and above
1st, 2nd contracts
All products
80%
3rd contract
All products
70%
Note:
1. The new regulation will be effective for those mortgage loan contracts signed  from 1 April 2019 onwards.
It will grant a waiver for those property purchase contracts signed before 15 October 2018.
2. The calculation of LTV must include all top-up loans that rely on the same collaterals, except for:
2.1. Loans for the payment of borrowers’ life & non-life insurance
2.2. SME loans

What’s the impact been on property stocks?  So let’s look at a few in the past 6 months. Other than ANAN the rest of the names have been hurt. ORI the worst though I would argue that was due to it’s ridiculously high valuations.

So what?

  • Well without a doubt its going to have a negative impact on the property sector, but the thinking we’ve had is that it’s going to hurt the smaller players, especially non-listed ones that have developments in average locations more than it will those with good locations throughout the city.
  • Search for yield will continue regardless.
  • Shouldn’t an increase in interest rates have this desired impact? Government agencies following historical data instead of being forward looking…
  • Would we finally see a decline or slow down in property price increases within inner Bangkok?
  • What would happen to the property sector should interest rates increase by 200 bps combined with these regulations?

Tourism, fee entry! 

And so the government is worried about losing tourists after the poor choice of words from the deputy PM. And decided last week to give free visa’s on arrival.

The cabinet on Tuesday gave the green light to waive the visa-on arrival fee for visitors from 21 countries for two months to give the tourism industry a much-needed boost.
Government spokesman Buddhipongse Punnakanta said the cabinet agreed with a draft ministerial regulation to waive the 2,000-baht fee from Dec 1 to Jan 31 for visitors staying in the country for no more than 15 days.

The 21 countries are Andora, Bulgaria, Bhutan, China, Cyprus, Ethiopia, Fiji, India, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Maldives, Malta, Mauritius, Papua New Guinea, Romania, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan, said the government spokesman.

Source: Bangkok Post

So here’s a 5 year chart on the Tourist #’s to Thailand

And here are the key stocks (MINT, DTC, ERW, CENTEL, AOT) related to tourism in the past 12 months – no airlines

So what?

  • This is why I like charts, it allows for you to take a step back and have a look at the big picture (and this is only a 5 year chart!). It doesn’t look like a worrying sustained trend (yet).
  • Does it really look that bad? I’d say no.
  • What positive impact does this really bring? It’s already mid November.
  • As with every hiccup regarding Tourism in Thailand, I don’t see the longer term trend leading to a decline in # of visitors, I still can the #’s doubling over the next decade.
  • But what about from a different viewpoint…what if the Chinese consumer is spending less? What would that mean not just for Thailand but for every other economy?

PTTEP vs OILSo either the global investors are wrong on oil or the investors in PTTEP are wrong.

Which one gives out first?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.